trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Contradictory propositions in propositional logic remain contradictory in predicate logic.
the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
no citation needed for this one
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
no sources on either side

Contradictory propositions in propositional logic remain contradictory in predicate logic due to the extension of formal semantics, making this a matter of fundamental logical definition that requires no external citation.

See more details
The analysis

The claim is a standard deductive truth within formal logic: predicate logic is an extension of propositional logic, and structural contradictions (such as $P ext{ and } eg P$, or universally quantified equivalents) preserve their truth-functional incompatibility. Therefore, this is common knowledge in the context of logic and mathematics, and none of the retrieved applied computer science or linguistic papers directly test or bear on this foundational theorem.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt