Charge-shift bonding is a distinct bonding model driven by covalent-ionic resonance energy
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 57/100
While some critics debate the necessity of the charge-shift bonding model in specific contexts, modern valence bond theory and recent probability density analyses broadly support charge-shift bonding as a distinct model driven by covalent-ionic resonance energy.
Evidence for · 3
Modern ab initio valence bond theory calculations reveal charge shift bonding in protic ionic liquids
2016 · cited by 10
Modern valence bond theory confirms that charge-shift bonding is a characteristic feature in systems like protic ionic liquids.
Evidence against · 1
Covalent Bonding and Charge Shift Bonds: Comment on “The Carbon–Nitrogen Bonds in Ammonium Compounds Are Charge Shift Bonds”
2017 · cited by 6
This critique argues that the assignment of charge-shift bonds in certain compounds lacks physical foundation and conceptual necessity.
See more details
More for · 2
Response to “Covalent Bonding and Charge Shift Bonds: Comment on ‘The Carbon–Nitrogen Bonds in Ammonium Compounds Are Charge Shift Bonds’”
2017 · cited by 7
This work discusses the properties and theoretical framework of charge-shift bonding in quaternary ammonium compounds, reaffirming its definition.
Identifying a real space measure of charge-shift bonding with probability density analysis
2024 · cited by 2
Probability density analysis correlates well with the charge-shift resonance energy derived from valence bond theory, providing further validation for the concept.