✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Wilhelm Ostwald believed in the physical reality of molecules.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Is it true that Wilhelm Ostwald believed in the physical reality of molecules?
No. Historical and encyclopedic evidence demonstrates that Wilhelm Ostwald was a prominent skeptic who denied the physical reality of atoms and molecules, viewing energy as the fundamental basis of reality instead.
Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked
How claims like this are judged
Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.
Evidence against · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: History of atomic theory. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_atomic_theory
See more details
More against · 2
Notes that Ostwald spearheaded a strong philosophical current that denied the existence of molecules.
Get citation
Simple English Wikipedia: Simple English Wikipedia: Johannes Diderik van der Waals. (n.d.). Simple English Wikipedia. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Diderik_van_der_Waals
Explains that Ostwald attempted to substitute the notions of atoms and molecular structure with less hypothetical conceptions.
Get citation
Wikisource: Wikisource: 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Isomerism. (n.d.). Wikisource. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclopædia_Britannica/Isomerism
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work