trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Vasectomy reversal procedures are not always successful.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Vasectomy reversal procedures are not always successful?

Yes. Clinical data confirms that vasectomy reversal procedures do not guarantee successful restoration of fertility, with pregnancy rates typically hovering around 50%.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim that vasectomy reversal procedures are not always successful is well supported by empirical evidence showing that patency and pregnancy rates are variable and far from 100%.

Evidence for · 2
2022
Get citation
DJ, A., M, L., S, V., C, D., J, H., O, V., AD, K., & I, U. (2022). Vasectomy Regret or Lack Thereof.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.38241

See more details
More for · 1
2025
Get citation
MA, S., J, B., R, S., D, A., J, B., & A, S. (2025). Prognostic Factors for Pregnancy and Patency Rates After Microsurgery for Obstruction of the Upper Seminal Tract: A Retrospective Single-surgeon Series of 336 Cases.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.010

What does the evidence say?

The claim that vasectomy reversal procedures are not always successful is well supported by empirical evidence showing that patency and pregnancy rates are variable and far from 100%.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work