trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Using timber for construction leads to deforestation.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that using timber for construction leads to deforestation?

Unclear. The retrieved items only partially touch the claim: one historical account notes commercial timber growing in South China, one lists timber for construction among forest products, and one study conditionally links timber recycling to deforestation under poor forest management. None directly establishes that using timber for construction causes deforestation.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Deforestation. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation

See more details
More for · 2
2010
Get citation
Perception on Socio-Economic and Demographic Causes of Deforestation and Its Consequences in Chena Woreda: The Case of Kafa Zone, SNNPRS. (2010). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre/8820

2026
Get citation
A, Y., A, D., E, S., M, G., C, D., C, R., S, v. E., & RJ, M. (2026). Mitigating Hidden Climate Change Impacts of Timber Cities Critically Depends on Proactive Forest and Waste Management.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c12250

Receipt History
held for human review18 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work