trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Training twice per day increases muscle gains compared with training once per day at equal total volume.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that training twice per day increases muscle gains compared with training once per day at equal total volume?

Partly. The retrieved studies only partially address the claim: two small twice-daily training studies report muscle-size gains without a once-daily comparison group, while several sprint-training and volume-equated resistance-training studies found no advantage of higher frequency, though they measured power, endurance markers or strength rather than muscle gains at equal total volume.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2005
Get citation
Hansen, A. K., Fischer, C. P., Plomgaard, P., Andersen, J. L., Saltin, B., & Pedersen, B. K. (2005). Skeletal muscle adaptation: training twice every second day vs. training once daily. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00163.2004

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Similar Muscular Adaptations in Resistance Training Performed Two Versus Three Days Per Week - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0062

See more details
More for · 2
2005
Get citation
Day-to-day change in muscle strength and MRI-measured skeletal muscle size during 7 days KAATSU resistance training: A case study. (2005). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3806/ijktr.1.71

Get citation
Increased muscle volume and strength following six days of low-intensity resistance training with restricted muscle blood flow. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.3806/ijktr.4.1

More against · 2
2014
Get citation
Effect of sprint training: Training once daily versus twice every second day. (2014). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.932849

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

Get citation
Effect of sprint training: Training once daily versus twice every second day. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.932849

Get citation
Effect of sprint training on resting serum irisin concentration — Sprint training once daily vs. twice every other day. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.006

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work