trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The vacuum of space is a good thermal insulator.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the vacuum of space is a good thermal insulator?

Unclear. Two sources partially support the idea: one notes that evacuated vacuum insulation panels achieve very low thermal conductivity, and another notes that quasi-vacuum nano-spaces suppress heat conduction. Neither directly addresses the general claim that the vacuum of space itself is a good thermal insulator.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2008
Get citation
Tenpierik, M., Spoel, W. v. d., & Cauberg, H. (2008). Analytical Model for Computing Thermal Bridge Effects in Thermally Highly Performing Building Panels. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.4122/1.1000001011

See more details
More for · 1
Get citation
Improved transparent thermal insulation using nano-spaces. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2015.02.012

Receipt History
held for human review17 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work