trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The ratio of undetected asymptomatic COVID-19 cases to confirmed cases is high.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the ratio of undetected asymptomatic COVID-19 cases to confirmed cases is high?

No. The available scientific evidence items that estimate the proportion or ratio of undetected asymptomatic COVID-19 cases indicate that these numbers are relatively low compared to total or confirmed cases, refuting the claim that the ratio is high.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Evidence against · 2
The study estimates the ratio of undetected asymptomatic cases to be relatively low (e.g., 6.9% and 22.4%).
Get citation
PLOS (all journals): Measuring the impact of social-distancing, testing, and undetected asymptomatic cases on the diffusion of COVID-19. (n.d.). PLOS (all journals). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273469

See more details
More against · 1
Finds a very low proportion and number of undetected asymptomatic cases relative to confirmed cases in South Korea.
Get citation
Semantic Scholar peS2o: Estimation of Undetected Asymptomatic COVID-19 Cases in South Korea Using a Probabilistic Model. (n.d.). Semantic Scholar peS2o. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4946/pdf

What does the evidence say?

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work