trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The ozone hole over Antarctica is shrinking.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the ozone hole over Antarctica is shrinking?

Unclear. Several sources indicate the Antarctic ozone layer is recovering and that ozone-depleting substances are declining, with one study reporting a trend reversal beginning in the early 2000s. None directly measures the hole's area shrinking over time; the NASA/NOAA recovery is a projection to the late 2060s.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 4
Get citation
Is there still a hole in the ozone layer?. (n.d.). earthscience.stackexchange.com. https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/22834

See more details
More for · 3
Get citation
Persistent extreme ultraviolet irradiance in Antarctica despite the ozone recovery onset. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05449-8

Get citation
NASA, NOAA Rank 2025 Ozone Hole as 5th Smallest Since 1992 - NASA Science. (n.d.). science.nasa.gov. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/nasa-noaa-rank-2025-ozone-hole-as-5th-smallest-since-1992/

2026
Get citation
Czerwińska, A. & Krzyścin, J. (2026). Trend Pattern (1980–2025) of Total Ozone Column over Antarctica in Winter–Spring Season, Derived from Heatmap Analysis—A New Approach to Detecting Ozone Hole Recovery. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18132174

Receipt History
held for human review18 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work