trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The longitudinal impact of climate on coronary heart disease mortality rates is well established.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the longitudinal impact of climate on coronary heart disease mortality rates is well established?

Yes. Current epidemiological literature consistently demonstrates that long-term climate variations and extreme temperatures significantly impact cardiovascular health and mortality rates over time.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 2
2020
This longitudinal study establishes the impact of ambient temperature and climate change scenarios on mortality rates.
Get citation
Revich, B. A., Shaposhnikov, D. A., & Shkolnik, I. M. (2020). Projections of temperature-dependent mortality in Russian subarctic under climate change scenarios: a longitudinal study across several climate zones. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/606/1/012050

See more details
More for · 1
2026
This review synthesizes evidence demonstrating that non-optimal temperatures are major climate-sensitive drivers of chronic cardiovascular disease and mortality.
Get citation
T, M., M, K., J, L., M, M., O, H., P, S., A, D., & A, S. (2026). Non optimal temperatures and chronic cardiovascular diseases.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-026-01085-w

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work