trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The interval from 0 to 2 contains more real numbers than the interval from 0 to 1.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the interval from 0 to 2 contains more real numbers than the interval from 0 to 1?

No. Two sources directly address the comparison: a mathematics reference states that any open interval is equinumerous with the whole set of real numbers, and a StackExchange answer gives explicit bijections showing [0,1] and (0,2) have the same number of elements. Both refute the claim that 0 to 2 contains more real numbers than 0 to 1.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 2
Get citation
Does the interval $[0,1]$ contains more real numbers than.... (n.d.). math.stackexchange.com. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2340771/does-the-interval-0-1-contains-more-real-numbers-than-0-2

See more details
More against · 1
Get citation
Cardinality of the continuum - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_the_continuum

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work