trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The gauche conformation of butane is 3.8 kJ/mol higher in energy than the anti conformation due to steric strain.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the gauche conformation of butane is 3.8 kJ/mol higher in energy than the anti conformation due to steric strain?

Yes. High-level quantum chemical calculations and thermochemical studies consistently support that the gauche conformation of butane is higher in energy than the anti conformation.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 2
1997
High-level ab initio quantum chemical calculations establish the relative torsional energetics of butane, confirming the gauche conformation is higher in energy than the anti conformation.
Get citation
Allinger, N. L., Fermann, J. T., Allen, W. D., & III, H. F. S. (1997). The torsional conformations of butane: Definitive energetics from <i>ab initio</i> methods. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473993

See more details
More for · 1
1984
Early ab initio molecular orbital calculations determine the rotational potential surface and energy differences between the trans (anti) and gauche conformations of n-butane.
Get citation
Raghavachari, K. (1984). Rotational potential surface for alkanes: Basis set and electron correlation effects on the conformations of <i>n</i>-butane. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447772

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work