trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The development of new refrigerants has helped slow the destruction of the ozone layer.

the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the development of new refrigerants has helped slow the destruction of the ozone layer?

Partly. While the development and regulation of new refrigerants and substitutes under the Montreal Protocol have successfully aided the recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer, many of these replacement fluorinated gases have introduced new environmental concerns by degrading into persistent chemicals like trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

Verdict: CONTESTED · 3 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim touches on two eras of refrigerant development. Older ozone-depleting refrigerants (like CFCs) were successfully replaced, and the Montreal Protocol framework is widely credited with helping the ozone layer recover, which is supported by papers 1, 3, and 4. However, newer generations of refrigerants (such as HFCs and HFOs) introduced as ozone-friendly alternatives are now recognized to break down into persistent and potentially toxic substances like trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), posing new planetary boundary threats as shown in papers 0 and 5. This trade-off creates a contested picture where solving the ozone problem has exacerbated chemical pollution challenges.

The evidence we hold leans leans supported

How this was weighed

official record 3x · fact-check 2x · hedged 1x · crowd & reference 1x

  • Arctic Ozone Depletion in 2019/20: Roles of Chemistry, Dynam · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.6 · 2020
  • Montreal Protocol's impact on the ozone layer and climate · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.3 · 2023
  • The success of the Montreal Protocol in mitigating interacti · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.3 · 2021
  • The Global Threat from the Irreversible Accumulation of Trif · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.6 · 2024
  • Finding non-fluorinated alternatives to fluorinated gases us · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.05 · 2024
Evidence for · 3
2020
Get citation
Feng, W., Dhomse, S., Arosio, C., Weber, M., Burrows, J., Santee, M., & Chipperfield, M. (2020). Arctic Ozone Depletion in 2019/20: Roles of Chemistry, Dynamics and the Montreal Protocol. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091911

Evidence against · 2
2024
Get citation
HPH, A., A, G., J, G., M, S., & IT, C. (2024). The Global Threat from the Irreversible Accumulation of Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA).. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06189

See more details
More for · 2
2023
Get citation
Egorova, T., Sedlacek, J., Sukhodolov, T., Karagodin-Doyennel, A., Zilker, F., & Rozanov, E. (2023). Montreal Protocol's impact on the ozone layer and climate. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5135-2023

2021
Get citation
Barnes, P., Bornman, J., Pandey, K., Bernhard, G., Bais, A., Neale, R., Robson, T., Neale, P., Williamson, C., Zepp, R., Madronich, S., Wilson, S., Andrady, A., Heikkilä, A., & Robinson, S. (2021). The success of the Montreal Protocol in mitigating interactive effects of stratospheric ozone depletion and climate change on the environment. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15841

More against · 1
2024
Get citation
J, G., K, B., A, H., C, V., D, M., IT, C., R, L., G, G., & M, S. (2024). Finding non-fluorinated alternatives to fluorinated gases used as refrigerants.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4em00444b

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work