trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The Coriolis effect is noticeable in everyday Earth activities.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the Coriolis effect is noticeable in everyday Earth activities?

No. A reference work states the Coriolis force is imperceptible for motions of everyday objects, becoming noticeable only over large distances and long periods, and physics discussions note it is far too small to observe in ordinary household settings such as bathtubs or toilets.

Verdict: REFUTED · 2 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Get citation
Coriolis Effect. (n.d.). nasa.gov. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/544859main_coriolis_effect.pdf

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Coriolis force. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force

See more details
More for · 1
2023
Get citation
Spin off: The Surprising History of the Coriolis Effect and the Jesuits Who Investigated It. (2023). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2023.a899373

More against · 2
Get citation
How to show that the Coriolis effect is irrelevant for the whirl/vortex in the sink/bathtub?. (n.d.). physics.stackexchange.com. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/32

Get citation
Flushing water-Is it related to Coriolis force?. (n.d.). physics.stackexchange.com. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/55190

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work