trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Telepathy is scientifically proven to exist.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
1 source for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Telepathy is scientifically proven to exist?

No. A US National Research Council panel found no scientific justification for telepathy, and the scientific community treats parapsychology as pseudoscience. A peer-reviewed analysis also questions the meta-analytic basis parapsychologists cite as their best evidence.

Verdict: REFUTED · 1 source for, 3 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 1
Clairvoyance and Occult Powers
Get citation
Clairvoyance and Occult Powers. (n.d.). gutenberg.org. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12480

Evidence against · 3
Telepathy
Get citation
Telepathy. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy

See more details
More against · 2
Dream telepathy
Get citation
Dream telepathy. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_telepathy

Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology
Get citation
Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology. (n.d.). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153049

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work