trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Roughly 75 percent of men with a PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/mL have no prostate cancer on biopsy.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that roughly 75 percent of men with a PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/mL have no prostate cancer on biopsy?

Unclear. Two sources give figures for the PSA 4-10 range: a cost-effectiveness analysis reporting 26% cancer prevalence and a clinic page stating a 25% chance of prostate cancer, both implying roughly three-quarters of men in that range have no cancer on biopsy. Neither is a dedicated prevalence study, so the evidence covers the claim only in part.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 2
Cost-Effectiveness of Percent Free PSA for Prostate Cancer Detection in Men with a Total PSA of 4–10 ng/ml
2007
Get citation
Bermúdez-Tamayo, C., Martín, J. J. M., González, M. d. P. L. d. A., & Romero, C. P. (2007). Cost-Effectiveness of Percent Free PSA for Prostate Cancer Detection in Men with a Total PSA of 4–10 ng/ml. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1159/000109720

See more details
More against · 1
Elevated PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) Level
Get citation
Elevated PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) Level. (n.d.). my.clevelandclinic.org. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/15282-elevated-psa-prostate-specific-antigen-level

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work