trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Reading in dim light increases the risk of cancer.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that reading in dim light increases the risk of cancer?

Unclear. The retrieved items link artificial light at night and circadian disruption to increased cancer risk, but none addresses reading in dim light specifically, so the claim is only indirectly and partially supported.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Exposure to artificial light at night and risk of cancer: where do we go from here? | British Journal of Cancer. (n.d.). nature.com. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-020-01231-7

See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Artificial Light at Night and Cancer: Global Study - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.10.4661

2025
Get citation
S, V., T, F., Y, P., G, S., & C, F. (2025). Night shift work and breast cancer: from etiopathology to precision risk analysis.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00863-3

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work