trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Radiocarbon dating is reliable for dating dinosaur fossils.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that radiocarbon dating is reliable for dating dinosaur fossils?

No. Multiple sources state that radiocarbon dating cannot accurately date dinosaur fossils: its range is far too short, and fossil bone cannot yield accurate radiocarbon dates. Dinosaur fossils are instead dated by other methods to millions of years old.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

Evidence against · 4
Get citation
Radiocarbon dating. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating

See more details
More against · 3
2020
Get citation
J., S. P. (2020). Radiocarbon in Dinosaur Fossils: Compatibility with an Age of Millions of Years. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.2.72

2018
Get citation
Is the discovery of tuff amongst dinosaur fossils in Utah incompatible with scientific consensus about dating of the fossils?. (2018). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/42014/is-the-discovery-of-tuff-amongst-dinosaur-fossils-in-utah-incompatible-with-scie

Get citation
Wikibooks: Planet Earth/3d. Radiometric dating: Using chemistry to tell time. (n.d.). en.wikibooks.org. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Planet_Earth/3d._Radiometric_dating:_Using_chemistry_to_tell_time

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work