trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Psychedelics and meditation produce similar mystical experiences.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that psychedelics and meditation produce similar mystical experiences?

Unclear. Several sources partially support the claim: one NLP study found psychedelic and meditation experience reports highly similar, a small pilot found one advanced meditation practice produced mystical scores comparable to high-dose psilocybin, and a preprint reports similar mystical-type insights across both. None directly compares full mystical experiences across psychedelics and meditation at the claim's general strength.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 5
Get citation
Psychedelic drug. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic_drug

See more details
More for · 4
2023
Get citation
Lyon, A. (2023). Psychedelic Experience. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=MFTaEAAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

2025
Get citation
K, K., R, S., & J, J. (2025). Comparing psychedelic and meditation experience reports with natural language processing.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27724-0

2024
Get citation
Woollacott, M., Riddle, J., Hermansson, N., Sacchet, M. D., & Ingram, D. M. (2024). Fire Kasina advanced meditation produces experiences comparable to psychedelic and near-death experiences: A pilot study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2024.103056

2025
Get citation
Jylkkä, J. (2025). Meditation and psychedelics facilitate similar types of mystical, psychological, and philosophical-existential insights predictive of wellbeing: A qualitative-quantitative approach. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ugr69_v1

Receipt History
held for human review18 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work