trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
People systematically discount or fail to listen to expert advice
the verdict
CONTESTED
the evidence cuts both ways
confidence 39/100

While people sometimes discount expert advice due to biases, partisan divisions, or political pressures, research shows that under many conditions individuals readily use and appreciate expert recommendations.

Evidence for · 2
Sincere or motivated? Partisan bias in advice-taking
2023 · cited by 8
Demonstrates that individuals systematically discount advice from sources they are biased against, such as counter-partisans.
Evidence against · 2
Improving judgement with prepaid expert advice
2004 · cited by 124
Shows that under certain conditions, such as committing money for advice, decision-makers readily utilize expert guidance.
See more details
More for · 1
Making expert advice public in a time of emergency: Independent SAGE and the contestation of science during the Covid pandemic in the UK
2025 · cited by 7
Describes how public health expertise was ignored and sidelined during the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a dismissal of expert guidance.
More against · 1
Is AI as trustworthy as human experts? The role of advice source, technology knowledge, and perceptions of AI’s impact in organizational decision-making
2025 · cited by 4
Finds that individuals place substantial weight on advice, showing no inherent aversion to expert sources compared to algorithms.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3901 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt