trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

People raised closely together in early childhood tend to develop little sexual attraction to each other, a pattern called the Westermarck effect.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that people raised closely together in early childhood tend to develop little sexual attraction to each other, a pattern called the Westermarck effect?

Yes. A reference article states the Westermarck effect and cites kibbutz, Shim-pua and cousin-marriage evidence that people raised together in early childhood tend not to be sexually attracted to one another; a separate review likewise reports that genetically unrelated children raised together from birth are unlikely to develop sexual relationships.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Westermarck effect
Get citation
Westermarck effect. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect

See more details
More for · 1
An Examination of the Westermarck Hypothesis and the Role of Disgust in Incest Avoidance Among Fathers -
Get citation
An Examination of the Westermarck Hypothesis and the Role of Disgust in Incest Avoidance Among Fathers - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919849924

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work