Observational studies suggest that interactions and relationships with companion animals may be beneficial for human health and wellbeing.
Is it true that observational studies suggest that interactions and relationships with companion animals may be beneficial for human health and wellbeing?
Yes. Observational and experimental studies provide robust support for the notion that companion animals and animal-assisted interactions offer meaningful mental and physical health benefits for humans.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 8 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The claim states that observational (and by extension broader empirical) studies suggest interactions with companion animals are beneficial for human health and wellbeing. Multiple retrieved papers—ranging from surveys on loneliness and companionship to clinical pilot studies, ecological momentary assessments, and randomized controlled trials—provide consistent support for positive psychological and emotional outcomes associated with pet ownership and animal interactions. Therefore, the balance verdict is SUPPORTED.
Get citation
Staats, S., Wallace, H., & Anderson, T. (2008). Reasons for Companion Animal Guardianship (Pet Ownership) from Two Populations. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853008x323411
See more details
Get citation
Liguori, G., Costagliola, A., Lombardi, R., Paciello, O., & Giordano, A. (2023). Human-Animal Interaction in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI)s: Zoonosis Risks, Benefits, and Future Directions—A One Health Approach. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101592
Get citation
Hoy-Gerlach, J., Vincent, A., Scheuermann, B., & Ojha, M. (2022). Exploring Benefits of Emotional Support Animals (ESAs): A Longitudinal Pilot Study with Adults with Serious Mental Illness (SMI). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2022.0016
Get citation
Valeri, R. M. (2006). Tails of Laughter: A Pilot Study Examining the Relationship between Companion Animal Guardianship (Pet Ownership) and Laughter. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006778149190
Get citation
S, P., N, J., K, H., J, E., & M, J. (2026). Human-animal interaction: understanding the role of dog and cat interactions in emotional wellbeing.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1768288
Get citation
CJM, S. & RM, C. (2026). Mutual wellbeing in an equine-assisted intervention: experimental evidence for the two-way hypothesis and the importance of interaction method.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-65168-2
Get citation
DH, F., S, D., K, M., KR, V., M, M., & MAR, U. (2026). Evaluating a Novel Cat-Assisted Training (CAT) Intervention for Youth with Developmental Disabilities and Their Family Cat.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16142133
Get citation
EM, M., T, E., A, A., & LO, N. (2026). The microbiome and non-occupational human-animal interactions: a scoping review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1938888
What does the evidence say?
The claim states that observational (and by extension broader empirical) studies suggest interactions with companion animals are beneficial for human health and wellbeing. Multiple retrieved papers—ranging from surveys on loneliness and companionship to clinical pilot studies, ecological momentary assessments, and randomized controlled trials—provide consistent support for positive psychological and emotional outcomes associated with pet ownership and animal interactions. Therefore, the balance verdict is SUPPORTED.
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work