trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can detect trisomy 18 with 99% accuracy and trisomy 13 with up to 90% accuracy.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can detect trisomy 18 with 99% accuracy and trisomy 13 with up to 90% accuracy?

Yes. Evidence from clinical studies and systematic reviews indicates that non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) achieves very high accuracy and sensitivity for detecting common chromosomal trisomies, supporting the stated detection rates for trisomies 18 and 13.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently supports the high diagnostic accuracy of NIPT for trisomy 18 (typically near or at 100% sensitivity with high specificity) and trisomy 13, aligning well with the claimed percentages. No papers refute these high accuracy figures.

Evidence for · 2
2026
Get citation
S, A. (2026). Diagnostic accuracy of cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies: a systematic review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.1886738

See more details
More for · 1
2026
Get citation
S, U., Y, M., S, S., K, S., & M, T. (2026). Neonatal cytogenetic validation demonstrates high accuracy of single-nucleotide polymorphism-based non-invasive prenatal testing: a 4466-case single-center study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-026-01483-w

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved literature consistently supports the high diagnostic accuracy of NIPT for trisomy 18 (typically near or at 100% sensitivity with high specificity) and trisomy 13, aligning well with the claimed percentages. No papers refute these high accuracy figures.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work