trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Most people are not persuaded by rational arguments due to motivated reasoning and cognitive biases
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 78/100

Extensive psychological and cognitive research demonstrates that human judgment is frequently driven by motivated reasoning, cognitive biases, and identity protection rather than purely rational evaluation of arguments.

Evidence for · 8
The Dark Side of Moral Conviction-Integrating Political Psychology, Cognitive Science, and Neuroscience.
2025 · cited by 2
Moral conviction fosters dogmatism and prevents objective evaluation of evidence.
See more details
More for · 7
When Rituals Fail: Rationalization, Bayesianism, and Predictive Processing.
2025 · cited by 2
Bayesian-rational processes and auxiliary hypotheses shield central beliefs from disconfirming evidence.
Emotion as a cross-layer mechanism in filter bubbles: a social-psychological perspective.
2025 · cited by 0
Motivated cognitive processing and emotional cues drive information filtering rather than objective reasoning.
Susceptibility to digital health misinformation: a multi-level narrative review.
2026 · cited by 0
Identity-driven reasoning and reduced cognitive reflection increase susceptibility to misinformation.
Rating our certainty: how confidence judgments amplify belief polarization.
2026 · cited by 0
Confidence judgments and selective rationalization exacerbate extreme subjective beliefs instead of promoting open-minded evaluation.
Cognitive-Affective Dynamics of Political Attitude Polarization: EEG-Based Behavioral Evidence from a COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Task.
2025 · cited by 0
Identity-driven cognitive-affective dynamics influence policy evaluations and lead to polarization.
Motivated reasoning in the field: polarization of prose, precedent, and policy in U.S. Circuit Courts, 1891-2013.
2025 · cited by 0
Judges exhibit motivated reasoning and partisan slant in their professional legal opinions.
Intelligent Systems, Vulnerable Minds: A Framework for Radicalization to Violence in the Age of AI.
2026 · cited by 0
Filter bubbles and cognitive biases leverage human vulnerabilities to strengthen extreme beliefs and insulate users from alternative views.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7801 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt