trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Machu Picchu was abandoned after the Spanish conquest.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Machu Picchu was abandoned after the Spanish conquest?

Yes. Two reference and scholarly sources state that Machu Picchu was abandoned around the time of, or soon after, the Spanish conquest, attributing the abandonment to the conquest.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Machu Picchu - Wikipedia
Get citation
Machu Picchu - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machu_Picchu

See more details
More for · 1
Machu Picchu
2015
Get citation
Machu Picchu. (2015). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.69

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work