trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Machine learning is required for artificial intelligence.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that machine learning is required for artificial intelligence?

Unclear. Three reference and review items treat machine learning as one method or subdomain within artificial intelligence, implying AI can exist without ML, but none directly settles whether ML is required for AI.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 3
Machine learning
Get citation
Machine learning. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning

See more details
More against · 2
Artificial intelligence and machine learning
2019
Get citation
Lesk, A. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and machine learning. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/hesc/9780198794141.003.0007

MACHINE LEARNING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENTS ON ASSOCIATIVE HETERARCHICAL MEMORY
2023
Get citation
MACHINE LEARNING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENTS ON ASSOCIATIVE HETERARCHICAL MEMORY. (2023). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.18469/ikt.2022.20.3.11

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work