trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Listening to Mozart's music raises listeners' general intelligence.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that listening to Mozart's music raises listeners' general intelligence?

No. A meta-analysis of replication studies found little evidence that listening to Mozart affects spatial reasoning, and the original researcher stressed that listening to Mozart has no effect on general intelligence; other sources likewise describe only brief, task-specific arousal effects rather than any gain in general intelligence.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 4
Get citation
Mozart, Music and Medicine. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1159/000364873

See more details
More against · 3
Get citation
Mozart effect - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozart_effect

2011
Get citation
Is listening to music while studying distracting?. (2011). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/5268/is-listening-to-music-while-studying-distracting

2010
Get citation
III, P. J. M. G. (2010). The Effect of Mozart's Music on Social Learning Behavior of High School Students. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542663

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work