trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Land mines remain dangerous after conflicts end.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that land mines remain dangerous after conflicts end?

Yes. A reference article states plainly that land mines remain dangerous after the conflict in which they were deployed has ended, harming civilians for decades. A systematic review and a robotics paper also note landmine injuries in post-conflict countries and mines still buried after wars.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2026
Get citation
A, N., C, G., M, S., & D, B. (2026). Pattern of blast injuries. A systematic review: Part 2 - Landmines, unexploded ordnance and terrorism.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-026-03241-1

See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Land mine - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_mine

Get citation
Study on quadruped walking robot in Tokyo Institute of Technology-past, present and future. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2000.844091

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work