trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
It is possible to have a preference relation that is complete but not transitive
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 87/100

Empirical evidence from behavioral and neurobiological studies shows that human and animal decision-makers frequently exhibit intransitive preferences while maintaining completeness, demonstrating that preference relations can be complete without being transitive.

Evidence for · 3
Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.
2016 · cited by 72
This study demonstrates that human decision-making frequently violates the axiom of transitivity due to neural noise, while remaining complete.
See more details
More for · 2
Efficiently irrational: deciphering the riddle of human choice.
2022 · cited by 22
The review explains how humans consistently make choices that are logically inconsistent (violating transitivity) as an adaptive optimization strategy.
Irrational behavior in C. elegans arises from asymmetric modulatory effects within single sensory neurons.
2019 · cited by 19
Experiments with C. elegans show that innate preferences robustly violate key rationality paradigms of transitivity.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8701 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt