trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Ingesting pure metallic gold is harmful to humans.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
1 source for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that ingesting pure metallic gold is harmful to humans?

Partly. One source reports that pure metallic gold micro-particles elicited no allergic reaction in patch-tested patients, and a skeptics discussion notes gold itself is hardly considered harmful and was historically swallowed medicinally. Neither source directly addresses whether ingesting pure metallic gold is harmful, so the evidence only partially bears on the claim.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 1 source for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 1
2026
Get citation
Rasmussen, S. & Bjerring, P. (2026). Is There an Allergy to Pure Metallic Gold Micro‐Particles?—An Epicutaneous Study of Gold Micro‐Particles, Gold Thiosulphate, and Placebo. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70140

Evidence against · 1
2021
Get citation
Does this medical study prove that wearing gold is harmful?. (2021). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/51902/does-this-medical-study-prove-that-wearing-gold-is-harmful

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work