trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

In the HUNT study in Norway, higher cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalization.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that in the HUNT study in Norway, higher cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalization?

Yes. Two peer-reviewed HUNT study reports (48,821-48,823 Norwegian adults) found that participants in the highest estimated cardiorespiratory fitness quintile had significantly lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (IRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86) than the lowest quintile.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2026
Get citation
EA, E., J, N., U, W., T, O., & D, S. (2026). Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity and risk of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 hospitalization: the HUNT study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-12684-1

See more details
More for · 1
2025
Get citation
Eriksen, E., Nauman, J. N. J., Wisloeff, U. W. U., Omland, T. O. T., & Stensvold, D. S. D. (2025). Association of pre-pandemic estimated cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity levels with COVID-19 incidence and hospitalization: the HUNT study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf236.141

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work