trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Immunotherapy desensitization protocols consist of an induction phase with increasing dosages followed by repeated maintenance doses.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that immunotherapy desensitization protocols consist of an induction phase with increasing dosages followed by repeated maintenance doses?

Yes. Immunotherapy desensitization protocols generally begin with an escalation or induction phase using gradually increasing dosages before transitioning to repeated maintenance doses.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim accurately describes the standard protocol for allergen immunotherapy (both subcutaneous and oral/sublingual), which involves an initial build-up or induction phase with escalating doses followed by a maintenance phase. Multiple retrieved clinical studies and guidelines (such as [0], [1], [2], [3], and [5]) explicitly detail this standard two-phase structure (updosing/escalation followed by maintenance).

Evidence for · 5
2023
Get citation
F, R., A, B., S, B., R, B., K, B., AM, C., U, D., J, F., T, F., M, G., S, G., E, H., W, H., L, K., L, L., H, M., NK, M., I, N., W, P., W, S., H, S., C, S., R, T., B, W., S, W., M, W., & T, J. (2023). Diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy: S2k Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Berufs- und Umweltdermatologie e.V. (ABD), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), German Respiratory Society (DGP), and the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI).. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.5414/alx02430e

See more details
More for · 4
2025
Get citation
H, H., KL, U., V, C., CC, Y., I, T., O, T., J, L., LQC, S., C, V., MH, S., & SJ, T. (2025). Oral Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Adults Using Real-World Materials.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.16493

2011
Get citation
Jung, K. (2011). Safety and tolerability of immunotherapy using various updosing schedules of a new SCIT product with an optimised allergen/aluminium hydroxide ratio. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02632.x

2012
Get citation
Jourdy, D. N. & Reisacher, W. R. (2012). Factors affecting time required to reach maintenance dose during subcutaneous immunotherapy. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21027

2025
Get citation
M, J., M, P., E, P., E, H., A, K., M, E., L, H., SK, G., EI, C., & LO, C. (2025). Subcutaneous Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Divergent IgA Responses in Nasal Mucosa and Blood With Validation of B Cell Class-Switching in Lymph Nodes and Blood.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.70097

What does the evidence say?

The claim accurately describes the standard protocol for allergen immunotherapy (both subcutaneous and oral/sublingual), which involves an initial build-up or induction phase with escalating doses followed by a maintenance phase. Multiple retrieved clinical studies and guidelines (such as [0], [1], [2], [3], and [5]) explicitly detail this standard two-phase structure (updosing/escalation followed by maintenance).

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work