✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Image generators such as Stable Diffusion were trained on billions of scraped images, including copyrighted artwork, without artists' permission.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that image generators such as Stable Diffusion were trained on billions of scraped images, including copyrighted artwork, without artists' permission?
Unclear. Two sources partially support the claim: Wikipedia's Stable Diffusion article confirms training on the 5-billion-image LAION-5B web-scraped dataset, and a Wikipedia copyright article reports artists' allegation that AI tools were trained on five billion scraped images without consent. Neither independently establishes that copyrighted artwork specifically was used without artists' permission.
Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Stable Diffusion. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_Diffusion
See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Artificial intelligence and copyright - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_and_copyright
Get citation
Evaluation of Deep Image Generation Through the Lens of Privacy and Utility. (2023). theses.hal.science. https://doi.org/10.70675/51327419zb5cbz4c00zb7aez9165372626fc
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work