Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Hygroscopic polyethylene glycol protects wood by replacing moisture and stabilizing dimensions

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

confidence 84/100

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment effectively stabilizes the dimensions of wood and protects it from degradation by replacing moisture and occupying cell spaces.

Evidence for · 3

Suitability of Different Variants of Polyethylene Glycol Impregnation for the Dimensional Stabilization of Oak Wood

2018 · cited by 32

Impregnation of wood with polyethylene glycol (PEG) results in significantly altered wood-water relations and improved dimensional stability.

citation format

See more details

More for · 2

Stabilisation of waterlogged archaeological wood: the application of structured-light 3D scanning and micro computed tomography for analysing dimensional changes.

2022 · cited by 4

PEG treatments combined with freeze-drying provide effective conservation and dimensional stability for waterlogged wood objects.

A multi-technique and multiscale comparative study on the efficiency of conservation methods for the stabilisation of waterlogged archaeological pine.

2024 · cited by 1

Polyethylene glycol impregnation effectively occupies wood cell lumina to help stabilize waterlogged archaeological wood structures.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8401 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Antimatter emits the same electromagnetic spectrum as normal matter and would look identical visually.?Is it true that A spontaneous macroscopic decrease in entropy is statistically extremely unlikely rather than strictly forbidden.?Is it true that Composite bosons can occupy the same quantum state at low temperatures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt