trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Hortobágy National Park is the oldest and largest national park in Hungary.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Hortobágy National Park is the oldest and largest national park in Hungary?

Yes. Multiple reliable reference and peer-reviewed sources confirm that Hortobágy National Park was established in 1973 as Hungary's first national park and remains its largest.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Hortobágy National Park. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hortob%C3%A1gy_National_Park

See more details
More for · 2
Confirms Hortobágy is the oldest (1973) and largest (82,000 ha) national park in Hungary.
Get citation
PLOS (all journals): Species Richness Responses to Structural or Compositional Habitat Diversity between and within Grassland Patches: A Multi-Taxon Approach. (n.d.). PLOS (all journals). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149662

Notes Hortobágy is the first national park in Hungary, established in 1973.
Get citation
Wikipedia: Wikipedia: Protected areas of Hungary. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_areas_of_Hungary

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work