✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Glass is a slow-flowing liquid, which is why old windows are thicker at the bottom.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against
Is it true that glass is a slow-flowing liquid, which is why old windows are thicker at the bottom?
No. Multiple sources, including a peer-reviewed article and physics and skeptics discussions, state that glass does not flow in historic time and that thicker-bottomed old panes result from pre-float manufacturing methods, not flow.
Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked
Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Are old glass panes thicker on the bottom due to "flow"?. (2012). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/7533/are-old-glass-panes-thicker-on-the-bottom-due-to-flow
See more details
More against · 2
Get citation
Do glass panes become thicker at the bottom over time?. (n.d.). physics.stackexchange.com. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/55829/do-glass-panes-become-thicker-at-the-bottom-over-time
Get citation
J., H. S. (2000). Glass Doesn't Flow and Doesn't Crystallize and It Isn't a Liquid.. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ610417
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work