Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Genetically modified food products produce adverse side effects

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

confidence 3/100

Comprehensive scientific reviews and regulatory risk assessments consistently find no credible epidemiological or toxicological evidence that genetically modified food products produce adverse side effects or chronic diseases.

Evidence against · 3

Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87705 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application GMFF-2023-21236).

2026 · cited by 2

EFSA safety assessments for genetically modified soybean MON 87705 found no evidence of new hazards, modified exposure, or adverse health effects.

citation format

See more details

More against · 2

Genetically modified foods and human health: a comprehensive review and cross-national time-trend analysis.

2026 · cited by 0

Comprehensive epidemiological reviews and time-trend analyses show no consistent causal links between genetically modified food consumption and major chronic diseases or adverse health effects.

Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87769 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF-2023-21253).

2026 · cited by 0

EFSA renewal assessments for genetically modified soybean MON 87769 likewise identified no new safety concerns or adverse health hazards.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 301 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Anxiety and psychological stress significantly alter bowel function and motility?Is it true that Green tea consumption significantly prevents tooth decay?Is it true that Blood cholesterol levels vary significantly across different age groups?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt