trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Frequent standardized testing improves students' reading comprehension.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
1 source for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that frequent standardized testing improves students' reading comprehension?

Partly. One peer-reviewed article states that research finds frequent testing improves students' learning outcomes generally, but it does not address reading comprehension specifically. Other sources indicate standardized reading tests measure rather than improve comprehension and that test anxiety depresses comprehension test performance, so the evidence only partially bears on the claim.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 1 source for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 1
2016
Get citation
Zachary, S. (2016). An Assessment of Student Perceptions and Responses to Frequent Low-Stakes Testing in Introductory Sociology Classes. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X15624745

Evidence against · 1
2016
Get citation
SG, W., SA, H., CW, L., & BM, P. (2016). Test anxiety and a high-stakes standardized reading comprehension test: A behavioral genetics perspective.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.3.0233

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

Get citation
Test anxiety and a high-stakes standardized reading comprehension test: A behavioral genetics perspective - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.3.0233

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work