trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Engineers have run computer simulations of the aircraft impacts on the World Trade Center towers.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that engineers have run computer simulations of the aircraft impacts on the World Trade Center towers?

Yes. A NIST engineer directly describes building and running computer models of the aircraft and towers and assembling global impact analyses, and a reference work notes NIST's statement that rigorous aircraft-impact simulation is a recent capability. Together these support that engineers have run computer simulations of the aircraft impacts on the World Trade Center towers.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Collapse of the World Trade Center
Get citation
Collapse of the World Trade Center. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center

See more details
More for · 1
Analyzing the Aftermath of the Twin Towers Aircraft Impacts | NISTLock
Get citation
Analyzing the Aftermath of the Twin Towers Aircraft Impacts | NISTLock. (n.d.). nist.gov. https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/analyzing-aftermath-twin-towers-aircraft-impacts

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work