✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Electron affinity increases across a period.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
7 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that electron affinity increases across a period?
Yes. Multiple reference and textbook sources state that electron affinity increases across a period from left to right, with one noting the trend holds prior to group 18. A couple of sources discuss the orbital-filling rationale or the neon exception without stating the trend outright.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 7 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 7
Get citation
Electron affinity. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_affinity
See more details
More for · 6
Get citation
Are there any major exceptions when comparing electron affinity?. (n.d.). chemistry.stackexchange.com. https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/163
Get citation
Jonathan, O. (2014). New MCAT : complete study package. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/newmcatcompletes0000orsa
Get citation
Trends in ionization energy in the second period. (n.d.). chemistry.stackexchange.com. https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/91590
Get citation
mcgrawhillencyclopediaofsciencetechnology10theditionvolume13parplan. (n.d.). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/mcgrawhillencyclopediaofsciencetechnology10theditionvolume13parplan
Get citation
Master the PCAT. (2012). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/masterpcat0000unse_r2i1
Get citation
MCAT general chemistry review notes. (2010). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/mcatgeneralchemi0000unse_w1r9
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work