trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Dowsing works for finding groundwater.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Dowsing works for finding groundwater?

No. Reference and peer-reviewed sources state that dowsing fails controlled tests and performs no better than random drilling, with one district study finding it far less successful than geophysical surveys.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Dowsing. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowsing

See more details
More against · 2
2026
Get citation
Shaikh, M. A. & Birajdar, F. (2026). Evaluation of dowsing methods for groundwater exploration in Solapur district, Maharashtra: A scientific analysis. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2026.20.2.1275

Get citation
fa Encyclopedia of Water Science Vol 2. (n.d.). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/fa_Encyclopedia_of_Water_Science_Vol_2

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work