trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Diamonds appreciate in value over time as an investment.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
1 source for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that diamonds appreciate in value over time as an investment?

Partly. One 1900 newspaper report describes Australian diamonds appreciating sharply over about a year during the South African war, while a skeptics discussion notes gemstone value varies wildly by specimen and is hard to compare. Neither source addresses whether diamonds generally appreciate as an investment over time.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 1 source for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 1
1900
Get citation
THE PRICE OF DIAMONDS. (Thames Star, 20 April 1900). (1900). paperspast.natlib.govt.nz. https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS19000420.2.10.2.9

Evidence against · 1
2014
Get citation
Are gem-quality diamonds common?. (2014). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/19573/are-gem-quality-diamonds-common

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work