trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Delayed auditory feedback of a person's own voice disrupts fluent speech.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
7 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that delayed auditory feedback of a person's own voice disrupts fluent speech?

Yes. Multiple sources state that delayed auditory feedback of a speaker's own voice disrupts normal speech production, producing artificial stuttering and reduced fluency in fluent speakers. Some items concern DAF's effects on stutterers' fluency rather than disruption of normal speech.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 7 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 7
Get citation
Delayed auditory feedback. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_auditory_feedback

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
Speech-Language Pathology/Stuttering/Delayed Auditory Feedback. (n.d.). en.wikibooks.org. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Speech-Language_Pathology/Stuttering/Delayed_Auditory_Feedback

See more details
More for · 6
Get citation
発声リズムとDelayed Auditory Feedback―正常者と言語障害者の比較―. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.5112/jjlp.19.157

Get citation
The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4906266

2005
Get citation
John, V. B., Reinilde, S., & Sophie, E. (2005). Speech Disruption under Delayed Auditory Feedback in Multilingual Speakers. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.05.001

2025
Get citation
Daliri, A., Honda, S., & Max, L. (2025). Delayed auditory feedback increases speech production variability in typically fluent adults but has the opposite effect in stuttering adults. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1628114

2011
Get citation
Kai, K. & Hartmut, R. (2011). Rhythmic versus Phonemic Interference in Delayed Auditory Feedback. eric.ed.gov. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0109)

1988
Get citation
Jonathan, H. (1988). Stuttering, Delayed Auditory Feedback, and Linguistic Rhythm.. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ368896

More against · 2
2011
Get citation
Andrade, C. R. F. d. & Juste, F. S. (2011). [Systematic review of delayed auditory feedback effectiveness for stuttering reduction].. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-64912011000200018

2026
Get citation
D, I., T, Y., & O, I. (2026). Immediate Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Stuttering: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published 2000-2024.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70283

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work