trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

DDT was banned in the United States.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that DDT was banned in the United States?

Yes. Multiple reference sources state that DDT was banned in the United States, several specifying 1972 and the EPA action.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 6
1997
Get citation
TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION: PERSISTENT ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES IN MIGRANT BIRDS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES AND MEXICO. (1997). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1897/1551-5028(1997)016 2.3.co;2

See more details
More for · 5
2016
Get citation
author, C. M. (2016). Women in science. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/womeninscience0000cole

2007
Get citation
Norman, P. (2007). The bald eagle. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/baldeagle0000pear

2001
Get citation
Highsmith, T. B. (2001). Mattie : a brown pelican. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/mattiebrownpelic0000tayl

Get citation
CapineraEncyclopediaOfEntomology2espringer2008. (n.d.). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/CapineraEncyclopediaOfEntomology2espringer2008

1977
Get citation
DDT residues in air in the Mississippi delta, 1975.. (1977). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/857242

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work