trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Cyberbullying is more common than traditional bullying.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that cyberbullying is more common than traditional bullying?

Unclear. Several studies from specific countries (China, Australia, the Nordic countries) report that traditional bullying is more common than cyberbullying, but each covers only one population and none directly compares global prevalence.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

Evidence against · 4
Cyberbullying
Get citation
Cyberbullying. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberbullying

See more details
More against · 3
Cyberbullying and traditional bullying among Nordic adolescents and their impact on life satisfaction
2019
Get citation
Arnarsson, A., Nygren, J., Nyholm, M., Torsheim, T., Augustine, L., Bjereld, Y., Markkanen, I., Schnohr, C., Rasmussen, M., Nielsen, L., & Bendtsen, P. (2019). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying among Nordic adolescents and their impact on life satisfaction. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494818817411

Experiences and Perspectives of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents in Mainland China-Implications for Policy
2021
Get citation
Li, J. & Hesketh, T. (2021). Experiences and Perspectives of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents in Mainland China-Implications for Policy. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672223

Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2019
Get citation
Jadambaa, A., Thomas, H. J., Scott, J. G., Graves, N., Brain, D., & Pacella, R. (2019). Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419846393

Receipt History
held for human review17 Oct 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work