✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Cramming produces better long-term retention than spaced study.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 5 against
Is it true that Cramming produces better long-term retention than spaced study?
No. A reference article states cramming tends to produce poor long-term retention (the spacing effect), and a 2021 cohort study found spaced and massed anatomy instruction gave equal long-term retention, while a nap study found cramming's early advantage gone after a week.
Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 5 against · Last checked
Evidence against · 5
Get citation
Cramming (education). (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramming_(education)
See more details
More against · 4
Get citation
Amabile, A. H., Kim, N., Georgetti, L. J., & Sims, A. C. (2021). Front-loading of anatomy content has no effect on long-term anatomy knowledge retention among physical therapy students: a prospective cohort study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02925-z
Get citation
X, Y. (2025). A Review of Judgments of Learning and Executive Functions in Spaced Learning: The Enemy of Spacing?. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77230
Get citation
Evidence of the Spacing Effect and Influences on Perceptions of Learning and Science Curricula - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21201
Get citation
Cousins, J., Wong, K., Raghunath, B. L., Look, C., & Chee, M. (2018). The long-term memory benefits of a daytime nap compared with cramming. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy207
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work