trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Chlorine has two stable isotopes, 35Cl and 37Cl, with natural abundances of 75.77% and 24.23% respectively.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that chlorine has two stable isotopes, 35Cl and 37Cl, with natural abundances of 75.77% and 24.23% respectively?

Yes. Multiple reference sources confirm that chlorine has two stable isotopes, 35Cl and 37Cl, with natural abundances near 75.77% and 24.23% respectively.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Evidence for · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Chlorine. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine

See more details
More for · 2
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Chlorine-37. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine-37

Notes chlorine has two stable isotopes, 35Cl and 37Cl, with abundances of 75.53% and 24.47%.
Get citation
Semantic Scholar peS2o: A Revisit to Vityaz Transform Fault Area, Central Indian Ridge: Isotopic Evidence of Probable Hydrothermal Activity. (n.d.). Semantic Scholar peS2o. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/a-revisit-to-vityaz-transform-fault-area-central-indian-ridge-isotopic-evidence-of-probable-hydrothermal-activity-2169-0049.1000125.pdf

What does the evidence say?

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work