✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Cats cannot taste sweetness because they lack a functional sweet taste receptor gene.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that cats cannot taste sweetness because they lack a functional sweet taste receptor gene?
Yes. A peer-reviewed genetic study reports that the cat Tas1r2 gene is an unexpressed pseudogene, so the functional sweet-taste receptor heteromer cannot form and cats lack the receptor needed to detect sweet stimuli. A second paper notes that obligate carnivores such as cats have lost sweet receptor function and are indifferent to sweeteners.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Li, X., Li, W., Wang, H., Cao, J., Maehashi, K., Huang, L., Bachmanov, A., Reed, D., Legrand-defretin, V., Beauchamp, G., & Brand, J. (2005). Pseudogenization of a Sweet-Receptor Gene Accounts for Cats' Indifference toward Sugar. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010003
See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Lei, W., Ravoninjohary, A., Li, X., Margolskee, R. F., Reed, D. R., & Beauchamp, G. K. (2015). Functional Analyses of Bitter Taste Receptors in Domestic Cats ( Felis catus ). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139670
Get citation
Jiang, P., Josue-Almqvist, J., Jin, X., Li, X., Brand, J. G., & Margolskee, R. F. (2014). The Bamboo-Eating Giant Panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca ) Has a Sweet Tooth: Behavioral and Molecular Responses to Compounds That Taste Sweet to Humans. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093043
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work