trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Brain training programs improve reading skills in students.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that brain training programs improve reading skills in students?

Partly. The retrieved items offer only partial, narrow support: a review of computerized cognitive training in students with disabilities, a systematic review of rhythmic training improving reading fluency, one small self-regulation training trial, and a review noting cognitive stimulation may aid reading comprehension. A general brain-training review finds little evidence of transfer to everyday cognitive performance, so no item settles the broad claim for students generally.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 4 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 4
2018
Get citation
Alaqeel, A. & Aldoghmy, O. (2018). A LITERATURE REVIEW ON EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTERIZED TRAINING PROGRAMS ON WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY AND READING ABILITY OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1239057

Evidence against · 1
Get citation
Brain training. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_training

See more details
More for · 3
2026
Get citation
The efficacy of rhythmic training for enhancing language and reading skills in children: a systematic review. (2026). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04969-6

2025
Get citation
Dermitzaki, I. (2025). Fostering Elementary School Students’ Self-Regulation Skills in Reading Comprehension: Effects on Text Comprehension, Strategy Use, and Self-Efficacy. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020101

Get citation
Impact of a cognitive stimulation program on the reading comprehension of children in primary education - PMC Lock. (n.d.). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985790

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work