trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Apples without seeds or core are safe for dogs to eat.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Apples without seeds or core are safe for dogs to eat?

Unclear. One item indicates apple seeds contain a cyanide compound but in amounts too trivial to cause harm, and another notes seeds sit inside the core, so a seedless, coreless apple would lack them. Neither item addresses dogs specifically, so the evidence only partially covers the claim.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2011
Get citation
Do apple seeds contain arsenic?. (2011). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4681/do-apple-seeds-contain-arsenic

See more details
More for · 1
Get citation
Apple. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work